- Home
- About GCIR
- Membership
- Programs
- About Immigration
- Immigrant Integration
- Publications
- FAQs
You are invited to a special briefing on Faith, Values, and the Economy hosted by Open Society Foundations, Nathan Cummings Foundation and Unitarian Universalist Veatch Program at Shelter Rock.
The Occupy Wall Street protests accomplished in a matter of months what progressives have struggled to do for years by focusing the nation’s attention on corporate greed, economic injustice and inequality. Shared prosperity, economic opportunity and corporate accountability are being recognized by more people as fundamental American values. The time has finally come for a moral debate about the economy.
But powerful opponents of economic fairness have consolidated their power and built a formidable policy, communications, and grassroots alliance. They have already mounted successful anti-union and voter-suppression campaigns and now stand poised to thwart progress toward economic justice and gut all remaining progressive public policy achievements of the past century.
A key component of their strategy of gutting Medicaid, eliminating unions and privatizing Medicare and Social Security is casting their agenda as a morally responsible solution that resonates with the values of average Americans. Yet the Occupy Wall Street movement and the work of progressive faith communities over the past five years has shown us that a different set of values can have more universal appeal. A group of prominent advocates have come up with a strategy to do just that. Please join us for a short briefing and discussion of their plan.
Featuring:
This conversation will be exclusively 501(c)3 in nature.
Lunch will be provided. Please RSVP by January 13, 2012 to Heddy Nam at hnam@sorosny.org.
Immigration is an indispensable piece of any strategy to boost economic growth and prosperity. Alongside investments in education and workforce-training systems, research and development, public infrastructure, and thoughtful regulatory policies that reduce barriers to employment, immigration policy can contribute directly to innovation, technological progress, and rising human-capital levels. While the United States has a natural advantage in attracting the world's most talented workers, employment-based immigration makes up too small a proportion of overall permanent immigration in the United States — even though it admits the country's most highly skilled foreign workers and serves as the most direct channel through which policymakers can shape the economic impact of immigration. The authors discuss the impact of immigration on the economy and the various policies directed toward workers. The authors also consider the role of immigrants in two important sectors: health care and information technology.
The policy debate regarding immigration has turned from the national scene to an issue being taken up by local and state governments given the lack of national immigration policy reforms. This report analyzes the impact of enforcement and deportation only policies such as Arizon'as S.B. 1070 finding that if the law were to have its full intended effect, there would be serious negative economic consequences for local economies. The authors find that legalizing immigrants, for example in Arizona, would have a net positive economic impact.
A teleconference regarding this report is also available online.
The Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration (CSII), University of Southern California invite you to this day-long program.
With the failure to secure comprehensive immigration reform in Washington – including the inability to pass even the DREAM Act – two things seem clear. The first is that what is driving the debate is not simply the immigration system per se, but also a deeper anxiety about the changing demographics and economics of our nation. The second is that the challenge of immigration policy is moving down the geographic scale: increasingly, the battles about integrating or restricting immigrants will occur at the state, regional, and local levels.
What are the key issues facing supporters of immigrant integration in the current moment? How can we "break through" the noise of the debate with solid data on the contributions of and progress by immigrants over time? How can new grassroots coalitions of business, community, and civic leaders impact their own regions and bubble up their efforts for a more welcoming approach as a nation?
Join us at Which Way, America? as we explore these questions, share the most recent research, and discuss how to reframe, regroup and realign for immigrant integration.
This conference was made possible with funding from the James Irvine Foundation.
California Community Foundation,Center for American Progress, Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA), Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees (GCIR), Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund,Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce,and USC College of Letters, Arts and Sciences.
Go to http://usc.edu/esvp and enter in CSII for the event code.
Minnesota has a long history of immigration with immigrants at the beginning of the 20th century contributing to the state's economic growth. With a new age of immigrants from new parts of the world, the state is beginning to ask critical questions to guide its growth in the coming years: What impact do immigrants have on the state’s economy and our public institutions? What role should immigration play in Minnesota’s future?
This report, commissioned by The Minneapolis Foundation, seeks to answer these questions and also identifies future research topics.
Through the H-2B program, employers fill temporary and seasonal positions outside of the agricultural sector with low-skill immigrant workers. Although a small program with only 66,000 H-2B visas available each year, the program plays a critical role in the economy, helping large and small employers to meet their staffing needs. From ski resorts in Colorado, seafood processing in Maryland, and the hospitality industry in Nantucket, workers on H-2B visas support regional industries. Many critics claim the program hurts American workers and leaves foreign workers vulnerable to exploitation. This report argues there is no economic evidence to support these claims, yet provides recommendations for streamlining and improving the program.
Immigrants often maintain ties with their country of origin and contribute financially to these communities. This phenomenon - diaspora philanthropy - is not a new phenomenon but may be evolving. This report by the Migration Policy Institute and USAID explores the myriad actors and motivations contributing to diaspora philanthropy and its interaction with public policy.
The Immigration Policy Center released fact sheets highlighting the role and impact of immigrant, Latino, and Asian populations on the U.S. economy for each of the 50 states and for the nation. In 2008, immigrants comprised 12.5% of the U.S. population, about 36% of which were naturalized U.S. citizens and 30% were Legal Permanent Residents. The data also find that immigrants are an integral component of the work force and are a growing portion of the electorate.
The Casey Foundation supported Appleseed in developing a manual that helps protect children and family assets when immigrants are deported. Nearly 5 million children are living in families at risk of separation due to increased immigration enforcement. When these working parents are deported, their U.S.-born children often remain here. The manual helps providers counsel their clients on issues such as establishing child custody, closing a bank account and transferring assets into their children's names. The Mexican government has translated the guide into Spanish and is distributing it through its network of consulates in the United States and Mexico.
In the ongoing debate about immigration, a number of studies have shown that immigrants have a positive impact on wages since, in addition to adding more people to the workforce, immigrants also consume goods and services which create jobs. This briefing paper examines the existing research and literature on the topic and follows with the author's own analysis of the available data. It finds that any negative effects of new immigration between 1994 and 2007 were felt largely by the workers who are the most substitutable for new immigrants—that is, earlier immigrants.
To order a copy of one of GCIR's publications, click here.